The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine.
نویسنده
چکیده
Household chemicals such as bleach, table salt, laundry detergent, toilet bowl cleaner, vinegar, lemon juice, and eyedrops are used for adulterating urine specimens. Most of these adulterants except eyedrops can be detected by routine specimen integrity tests (creatinine, pH, temperature, and specific gravity); however, certain adulterants such as Klear, Whizzies, Urine Luck, and Stealth cannot. These adulterants can successfully mask drug testing if the concentrations of certain abused drugs are moderate. Several spot tests have been described to detect the presence of such adulterants in urine. Urine dipsticks are commercially available for detecting the presence of such adulterants, along with performance of tests for creatinine, pH, and specific gravity. Certain hair shampoo and saliva-cleaning mouthwashes are available to escape detection in hair or saliva samples, but the effectiveness of such products in masking drugs-of-abuse testing has not been demonstrated. Ingestion of poppy seed cake may result in positive screening test results for opiates, and hemp oil exposure can cause positive results for marijuana. These would be identified as true-positive results in drugs-of-abuse testing even though they do not represent the actual drug of abuse.
منابع مشابه
آشکارسازی تقلبهای منجر به پاسخهای منفی کاذب در آزمایش تشخیص اعتیاد
Background: Drug abusers are persistently trying to use masking techniques for hiding their addiction. Detection of false negative results of urine morphine test which caused by adulterants is the main goal of this study. Materials and methods: Screening test for detecting urine morphine was done by two kinds of Immuno-chromatography rapid tests and the positive results confirmation done by TL...
متن کاملAdulterants and drugs-of- abuse testing: an update.
There are two categories of products that are commercially available in order to “beat” drug tests. The first category includes taking specific fluids or tablets (hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic), along with substantial water intake to flush out drugs and metabolites. Many of these products can produce diluted urine, thus reducing concentrations of abused drugs/metabolites. Common products are ...
متن کاملSpecimen Validity Testing SVT) - Effects of Oxidizing Agents on Drugs in Urine and Procedures for Detection.
Since the inception of the drug-testing program in the U.S. Armed Forces in 1982, urine adulteration with the intent to conceal drug use has been a serious problem to forensic scientists. Initially, drug users tried almost anything that was available at the collection sites. Soon they recognized that certain chemicals could be used to destroy some drugs and interfere with the testing procedures...
متن کاملZinc reduces the detection of cocaine, methamphetamine, and THC by ELISA urine testing.
Federal workplace drug testing was initiated during the late 1980s. Since then, numerous methods have been employed to subvert these drug tests, adulteration of urine samples being the most common. A wide variety of adulterants has been reported to date along with suitable methods of their detection. Recently, websites have claimed that zinc sulfate can be an effective adulterant to bypass drug...
متن کاملIntegrity of Urine Specimens for Toxicological Analysis - Adulteration, Mechanisms of Action, and Laboratory Detection.
Drug testing in urine for employees is an important deterrent for drug abuse. Because of the dire consequences of a positive result, many individuals who might otherwise test positive will go to great lengths to escape detection. The term "adulteration" in this context refers to: substitution of drug-free urine, purposeful ingestion of agents or fluids designed to either accelerate drug clearan...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- American journal of clinical pathology
دوره 128 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007